Unfortunately today is my last day in the employ of the Spencer Museum of Art working on the Arts, Research, Collaboration initiative. It has been a very fun ride over the last two years. The image above if from my first day in the ARC office and a lot has changed since then. I have worked with many great colleagues and many great artists, scientists, and technologists. Now it is time for me to get back to being an artist researcher. My wonderful colleague Rebecca Blocksome is off to do residencies at the Pistoletto Foundation and the Banff Centre this autumn. Thanks to everyone who has been involved in ARC over the last two years. ARC will continue on in some form at the Spencer so keep an eye on this space and don’t hesitate to get in touch.
SMA & ARC Postdoctoral Researcher, Steven Duval, and SMA Videographer, Ryan Waggoner, made a film for the Hybrid Practices Conference called ‘Peer Review’. The film which was shot in November 2014 and January 2015 is comprised of interviews with Maurice Tuchman, Jane Livingston, Julie Martin, Robert Whitman, Elsa Garmire, and John Pierce. The film explores issues relating to collaborations between artists, technologists, and scientists in the historical projects of E.A.T. and Art & Technology at LACMA. These photos are from both film shoots and show Duval & Waggoner working with various interviewees who were kind enough to offer their time and sometime their homes for filming. Special thanks to Julie Martin who was instrumental in facilitating some of the interviews. The film was generously supported by the Terra Foundation for American Art.
Creative Commons photo by Flickr user Paulus Maximus
While normally I’m not a huge fan of information visualization projects, this physics-botany-architecture hybrid looks amazing!
Educational Technologist Dana Atwood-Blaine and I have created a game for the exhibition, Art + Science, at The University of Kansas’ Watson Library and would love it if you would come a play. Using the ARIS platform, players use the books throughout the stack to create a practice-led research question and get all of the research grant money. It is currently in its beta form so there are still a few bugs to work out. Please try it out and help us make it better and more fun.
Last week I attended the Games, Learning, Society conference in Madison, WI. It was a great experience that I would recommend to anyone interested in learning through games. The first day was spent at the ARIS summit. ARIS or Augment Reality for Interactive Storytelling is the platform we plan to use for our Performing History project. At the summit I met the very affable David Gagnon, who started ARIS while doing his masters. I also heard about some great projects using ARIS and participated in a workshop to use ARIS in its current format. In September ARIS is rolling out its 2.0 version that uses HTML 5.
The second day of the conference I saw many different presentations discussing games in a learning environment. The first talk I saw was on the obligatory nature of games in the classroom and whether the context kills the fun. It was interesting as an outsider to see an important debate within this context about the imperative that games be ‘fun’. That session linked really well with the next session I went to on failure in games. This series of papers addressed how failure is built into commercial games and the prescriptive nature of ‘winning’ games versus exploring games. These papers examined how we define success and if there is room for other kinds of players that explore, subvert, or circumvent the game protocols and world. A big word in this conference was agency. Agency was the key to getting players immersed, involved and invested in the game. Without it players will learn less and are less likely to even finish a game. Another paper’s research focused on the player’s empathic connection to his/her avatar. There was an extensively detailed paper on how avatars that are created by players (versus generic avatars) allow for the players to be immersed in the world and fully identify with their characters.
In the afternoon I went to a paper session on analytics. How do we get data from games that are useful, and how do we get qualitative information from the click stream? There was a lot of talk about testing as often as possible during the development of the game. The second afternoon session was dedicated to getting students to understand ideologies and how they operate in the worldview of politicians. This was interesting, since the connection between the two proved to be difficult for most undergraduate students. Despite many iterations of similar games, students couldn’t make the connection between an ideology of e.g. ‘Libertarianism’ and politicians who call themselves Libertarian. There was also discussion about creating a cognitive empathic response in players which boiled down to more peer-to-peer interactions.
On the third day the keynote was Scot Osterweil from MIT. He, echoing conversations from the day before, talked about making sure that the game is a space of freedom and play. He saw many games as being deterministic but saw freedom to play in the world of a subject to be as good as it could get in terms of engagement. The morning session was about interactions in games. The first paper was a science school project, using ARIS, to get students to solve a mystery using science. What I got out of this paper was the nature of language in determining how players interact with each other and the game—if a player used positive language, their interactions and learning were stronger.
The afternoon was focused on the role that gender plays in games. As you might imagine, the world of games is quite male-oriented, and this session analyzed the reason why through interviews with women in the industry. There was also an analysis of Lego in determining gender roles and agency. The final program was about how role-playing games can be used in the classroom. Overall the week was great. I met a lot of people, as GLS is a very friendly conference.
For more information go to:
We’ve been away from blogging for a while because we have been developing a project called Performing History. The project uses a mobile phone and GPS application (or app) to help guide users across the urban terrain and to interact with it virtually throughout history. This app allows the user to choose an identity/avatar to embody and interact with a historical environment. The platform we intend to use is called ARIS, which was developed by the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The game requires players to have basic cell-phone knowledge, including how to upload a picture, tag an image, or record a video. Users will work their way through the game, utilizing creative problem-solving skills to overcome obstacles in the historical narrative. Sometimes the game will ask them to encounter a historical context as well as respond to it, and have agency in the story. By doing this, users will create possible histories and have more buy-in within the process of engagement with subject. Users will also be able to interact with each other, developing more complex narratives.
The game will deal directly with Lawrence’s rich history, from its origins as an abolitionist town to the early life of Langston Hughes and other prominent African Americans who lived here. Delving into this history will help users to see the time and place they currently live in with new eyes. The game will also make history more engaging for participants, giving them an entryway to further scholarship and a relationship with the past. One of the main goals for the project is to give users what the sociologist Victor Turner called a “liminoid” experience—an experience of personal and social ambiguity, with multiple possible outcomes. Role-play games often provide liminoid experiences for players, giving them an opportunity to consider life through the eyes of others.
Reference Link – http://arisgames.org/
Today at ARC we had a fantastic virtual meeting with the people at arts@CERN and collide@CERN. This collaboration was the brainchild of Daniel Tapia Takaki who is a physicist at KU and CERN. The team at CERN were Panos Charitos, Adelina von Fürstenberg, and Rosalind McLachlan. Today it was decided that we will be having public and private roundtable discussions on November 19th at The Commons here in Lawrence. Rosalind will be discussing her project ‘CERN as an Archeological Site’ and Adelina will be presenting the past projects at CERN. We at ARC are very excited by the project and the possibilities of what future projects we might make together. Below you can find out more about everyone involved in our collaboration. We will be posting more on this project as it progresses.